<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t talk to me &#8217;bout &#8220;True&#8221; if you ain&#8217;t Spandau Ballet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mollena.com/2008/10/dont-talk-to-me-bout-true-if-you-aint-spandau-ballet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mollena.com/2008/10/dont-talk-to-me-bout-true-if-you-aint-spandau-ballet/</link>
	<description>it ain't just the hair that's kinky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:51:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malc</title>
		<link>http://www.mollena.com/2008/10/dont-talk-to-me-bout-true-if-you-aint-spandau-ballet/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>Malc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mollena.com/?p=821#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>Heh! Here&#039;s a game I can play...  he he he!

OK, ignoring the essential fact that the people who use the word in the contexts that provoketh the Mollen-ire are (as is predictable) using an entirely different word which they are spelling incorrectly[1], there are a number issues I&#039;m going to take with your rant.

The biggy is that dictionaries don&#039;t list definitions in strict order of &quot;the average person&#039;s expectation&quot;, for the simple reason that all definitions are valid; obviously, context is king.

Next, I disagree that 7, 8 and 9 _could not_ be applicable; sure, that&#039;s extremely likely not what the offending writers were thinking, but _a_ writer somewhere _could_ use it that way.

Finally: number 14 is, of course, what the offenders want to suggest... BUT there _is_ no &quot;natural group&quot;, here and I dare say the horseshoe crab thinks itself a proper crab...

Malc.

[1]  The word they really want is &quot;twue&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh! Here&#8217;s a game I can play&#8230;  he he he!</p>
<p>OK, ignoring the essential fact that the people who use the word in the contexts that provoketh the Mollen-ire are (as is predictable) using an entirely different word which they are spelling incorrectly[1], there are a number issues I&#8217;m going to take with your rant.</p>
<p>The biggy is that dictionaries don&#8217;t list definitions in strict order of &#8220;the average person&#8217;s expectation&#8221;, for the simple reason that all definitions are valid; obviously, context is king.</p>
<p>Next, I disagree that 7, 8 and 9 _could not_ be applicable; sure, that&#8217;s extremely likely not what the offending writers were thinking, but _a_ writer somewhere _could_ use it that way.</p>
<p>Finally: number 14 is, of course, what the offenders want to suggest&#8230; BUT there _is_ no &#8220;natural group&#8221;, here and I dare say the horseshoe crab thinks itself a proper crab&#8230;</p>
<p>Malc.</p>
<p>[1]  The word they really want is &#8220;twue&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

